By Alan Reynolds —
Alternative monetary systems cannot be evaluated in isolation, but only in comparison with other arrangements. The question “why gold?” thus divides into two other questions. The first is “compared to what?” The second is “why not?”
Criticism of gold usually considers the second question first, as though a superior option was known to exist. We will therefore begin by showing that the usual criticisms reflect fundamental misunderstanding about what a gold standard is, how it works, and even when it was in effect. There will then be a brief historical comparison of metallic and fiat money, and a theoretical criticism of hypothetical alternatives. We will also explain why it was in the interests of even myopic government officials to return to gold in the past, and why it is also in their interest today.
To read the entire article, click here.
Image by jscreationzs / FreeDigitalPhotos.net.
"There are so many holes in the FTC and Sony’s opposition to the Microsoft-Activision merger… Read More
"A wide range of outcomes are still possible for 2023, ranging from stagflation to a… Read More
"The real 'capitalist achievement,' however, isn’t Graceland. It’s the fact that compared to the stuff… Read More
"The unseen cause of gentrification is the knee-jerk NIMBYism of affluent leftist neighborhood associations. And… Read More
"Politicians on the left would like us to believe inflation is caused by greedy corporations.… Read More
"As 'dark horse' candidate, Ramaswamy has a greater burden of proof before the electorate.… Read More
"The US economy may continue to grow or shrink few percent from year to… Read More
"Forbidding entrepreneurial ventures that have not been granted prior approval and design review by unelected… Read More
*AIER is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit registered in the US under EIN:04-2121305