Bill Bengen’s 1994 research that established the 4 percent rule was seeking the maximum constant dollar withdrawal that would have lasted for any historical 30-year period. But is 30 years the right planning horizon for you? If not, how should you adjust the guideline?
There are several primary factors that will affect your planning horizon:
At the extremes, a healthy, risk-averse couple retiring at age 55 may want to consider a horizon that is more than 40 years, whereas a single male working until he’s 80 can safely plan for a retirement of less than 20 years.
The table below looks at planning horizons based on recent life expectancy data. These factors can help you assess an appropriate planning horizon and judge whether rules of thumb such as the 4 percent rule should be adjusted accordingly. As compared with a 30-year horizon, a 20-year horizon can probably increase the safe withdrawal rate by about 1.3 percent, whereas a 40-year horizon should probably decrease the safe withdrawal by about 0.7 percent.
"Power, by which I mean political power, is always zero-sum: if the intellectual elite has… Read More
"The Biden administration threatens to invoke Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment to sidestep the… Read More
"There are so many holes in the FTC and Sony’s opposition to the Microsoft-Activision merger… Read More
"A wide range of outcomes are still possible for 2023, ranging from stagflation to a… Read More
"The real 'capitalist achievement,' however, isn’t Graceland. It’s the fact that compared to the stuff… Read More
"The unseen cause of gentrification is the knee-jerk NIMBYism of affluent leftist neighborhood associations. And… Read More
"Politicians on the left would like us to believe inflation is caused by greedy corporations.… Read More
"As 'dark horse' candidate, Ramaswamy has a greater burden of proof before the electorate.… Read More
*AIER is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit registered in the US under EIN:04-2121305