“First, discretionary policy at times tends to be dominated by goals other than, and even contradictory to, stabilization (for example, pegging bonds yields, halting gold outflows), whereas the automatic framework cannot be so readily exploited for other purposes. Second, the inertia and the political considerations referred to above that inhibit the ready reversal of discretionary policies when they turn out to be in the wrong direction make for a longer lag than would otherwise exist between the recognition of the need for action and the taking of action and introduce much higher serial correlation into perverse discretionary actions than into perverse automatic reactions.” Read more.
“The Lag in Effect of Monetary Policy”
Milton Friedman
The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 69, No. 5 (Oct. 1961), pp. 447-466
Image by graur razvan ionut / FreeDigitalPhotos.net.
"Power, by which I mean political power, is always zero-sum: if the intellectual elite has… Read More
"The Biden administration threatens to invoke Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment to sidestep the… Read More
"There are so many holes in the FTC and Sony’s opposition to the Microsoft-Activision merger… Read More
"A wide range of outcomes are still possible for 2023, ranging from stagflation to a… Read More
"The real 'capitalist achievement,' however, isn’t Graceland. It’s the fact that compared to the stuff… Read More
"The unseen cause of gentrification is the knee-jerk NIMBYism of affluent leftist neighborhood associations. And… Read More
"Politicians on the left would like us to believe inflation is caused by greedy corporations.… Read More
"As 'dark horse' candidate, Ramaswamy has a greater burden of proof before the electorate.… Read More
*AIER is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit registered in the US under EIN:04-2121305