August 28, 2021 Reading Time: 4 minutes

July marked record-high year-on-year inflation since the 2008 crisis. Naturally, inflation has become a matter of concern not only in the government but also in the private sector. The main point of concern is if the US economy is entering a new era of high inflation or if the latest high rates are just transitory. The concern about a new age of high inflation is understandable. High inflation is costly and difficult to stop.

Economists do not have a crystal ball. We cannot say for sure whether the latest higher-than-normal inflation rates are transitory or normal. But economics provides a simple analytical framework to help us think through the problem.

For starters, we need to define inflation. The typical textbook treatment defines inflation as a persistent rise in the general price level. The “general price level” means most prices, not just a few. The CPI, core-CPI, and the GDP deflator are three standard measures of the general price level. The “persistent rise” means the rise in prices must be long-lasting, not just observed for a month or two. 

Next, we need to understand what drives a change in the price level. There are three variables. The first variable is the amount of money in the economy. All else equal, an increase in money supply tends to increase prices. The logic is straightforward: if there is more money chasing the same amount of goods, the prices of those goods will rise. 

The second variable is the demand to hold money. All else equal, a decrease in money demand will push prices up. To see this, suppose both the money supply and quantity of goods is fixed. To reduce their money balances, people must make more expenditures than they otherwise would. This is as if there were more money chasing after the same amount of goods—not because there is more money, but rather because the available money changes hands more frequently. A reduction in the demand to hold money, in other words, corresponds to an increase in the velocity of money.

The third variable affecting the price level is the number of goods and services produced. All else equal, a reduction in output tends to raise prices. This, too, is as if there were more money chasing after the same amount of goods—not because there is more money or the available money is spent more frequently, but rather because there are fewer goods.

Since inflation is the percent change in the price level, we have the following relationship: gP = gM + gV – gY, where gP is the growth rate of the price level (i.e., inflation), gM is the growth rate of money supply, gV is the growth rate of velocity, and gY is the growth rate of real output.

We can explain the recent high inflation rates following the equation above: 

  1. stimulus packages led to more money in the hands of the public
  2. as businesses were allowed to reopen and the public felt comfortable going back to stores and restaurants, velocity picked up; and 
  3. ongoing supply disruptions following the pandemic have reduced output. 

Reasonable people might disagree about the relative magnitudes of these three variables, yet we can explain the recent spike in inflation.

We can also use this equation to consider whether inflation will be permanently higher. If gP is permanently higher, it must be because (i) money growth is permanently higher, (ii) velocity growth is permanently higher, and/or (iii) output growth is permanently lower.

Of these, the latter two seem very unlikely. The last year was marked by an incredible reduction in consumption. Elevated spending observed the last few months is, in large part, a matter of making up for lost time. Velocity will eventually return to normal levels. Likewise, the supply constraints will ultimately subside, as the temporary period of reduced production which began in March 2020 gradually makes its way through the supply chain. 

Whether the US is entering a period of high inflation depends primarily on what will happen to the money growth. If money growth returns to its pre-pandemic trend, inflation will fall back down to around 1.7 percent. If, instead, the Federal Reserve allows the money supply to grow a bit faster than it did prior to the pandemic, perhaps in an effort to hit its new average inflation target, inflation will fall from its current high rates but remain higher than it was prior to the pandemic. Finally, if the Fed permits the money supply to grow at rates observed over the last year, perhaps to help the Treasury paper over higher long-term government spending, then inflation will remain high. It is no surprise, therefore, that much attention has been given to recent statements from Fed officials, which might provide some indications about the future stance of monetary policy.

The price level today is higher than where it would have been given its historical pre-pandemic trend and higher than it would have been if the Fed had delivered 2 percent inflation over the course of the pandemic. But this does not mean that inflation will remain high. Inflation is not a high price level; it is a persistent increase in the price level. Whether inflation persists depends on what Fed officials do next.

Nicolás Cachanosky

Dr. Cachanosky is Associate Professor of Economics and Director of the Center for Free Enterprise at The University of Texas at El Paso Woody L. Hunt College of Business. He is also Fellow of the UCEMA Friedman-Hayek Center for the Study of a Free Society. He served as President of the Association of Private Enterprise Education (APEE, 2021-2022) and in the Board of Directors at the Mont Pelerin Society (MPS, 2018-2022).

He earned a Licentiate in Economics from the Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, a M.A. in Economics and Political Sciences from the Escuela Superior de Economía y Administración de Empresas (ESEADE), and his Ph.D. in Economics from Suffolk University, Boston, MA.

Dr. Cachanosky is author of Reflexiones Sobre la Economía Argentina (Instituto Acton Argentina, 2017), Monetary Equilibrium and Nominal Income Targeting (Routledge, 2019), and co-author of Austrian Capital Theory: A Modern Survey of the Essentials (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Capital and Finance: Theory and History (Routledge, 2020), and Dolarización: Una Solución para la Argentina (Editorial Claridad, 2022).

Dr. Cachanosky’s research has been published in outlets such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Public Choice, Journal of Institutional Economics, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, and Journal of the History of Economic Thought among other outlets.

Get notified of new articles from Nicolás Cachanosky and AIER.