May 2, 2010 Reading Time: < 1 minute

“For much of monetary history, inflation targeting was unnecessary. There was no need to worry about constraining the central bank’s inflationary proclivities because no central bank existed. The quantity of basic money was constrained by the mints’ commitment to full-bodied gold and silver coinage (at least where the mint-owners lacked monopoly status or chose not to exploit that status through debasement). The quantity of bank-issued money was constrained by the commercial banks’ commitment to gold- and silver-redeemability for banknotes and deposits. Together these commitments prevented excessive monetary expansion and thereby price inflation. Today (since 1971) the commitments are gone, and a substitute is needed.

Inflation targeting has been much discussed in recent years as a proposal for constraining the Federal Reserve’s monetary policymaking. As proposed constaints on central banking go, it is relatively weak. Inflation targeting doesn’t abolish the central bank, and—at least in the well-known version recommended by Bernanke et al. (1999)—doesn’t even fasten a strict rule on it.”

Lawrence H. White (2007)
What Type of Inflation Target?
Cato Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2 (Spring/Summer 2007)

Marius Gustavson

Get notified of new articles from Marius Gustavson and AIER.

Related Articles – Central Banking, Monetary Policy, Sound Money Project

AIER - American Institute for Economic Research

250 Division Street | PO Box 1000
Great Barrington, MA 01230-1000

Contact AIER
Telephone: 1-888-528-1216 | Fax: 1-413-528-0103

Press and other media outlets contact
[email protected]

Editorial Policy

This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
except where copyright is otherwise reserved.

© 2021 American Institute for Economic Research
Privacy Policy

AIER is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
registered in the US under EIN: 04-2121305