If you’ve ever applied for a job, you’ve probably seen one particular question on your form: do you have a criminal record? But it’s becoming increasingly likely that you won’t be asked the next time you apply.
There is a growing movement to “ban the box” in the United States, prohibiting employers from asking about criminal histories on applications. Such laws have been enacted recently for Wake County government employees in North Carolina and private businesses in Austin, Texas while similar bill is on the table in Colorado, just to name three examples in the news this past week. Supporters often argue these laws are important to help give past offenders a fair look in the hiring process, which could both reduce recidivism and enhance productivity.
Recently, I had the opportunity to learn a little bit more about this topic at the Population Association of America meeting. In a session about labor market dynamics among youth, one presentation was titled “Does Criminal Past Predict Worker Performance: Evidence from the Nation’s Largest Employer.” The employer in question is the United States armed forces.
The researchers, Jennifer Lundquist, Joya Misra and Eiko Strader, obtained administrative data on enlistees, including whether they had been admitted with a waiver for an otherwise disqualifying felony arrest. Because ex-offenders had to qualify through this screening process, they are, of course, not representative of all felony offenders. But they may be representative of ex-offenders whose resumes would catch the eye of civilian employers.
The authors found the ex-offenders were no more likely to be discharged before the end of their term than the general population, and they were in fact more likely to eventually be promoted to sergeant than an average recruit.
There are reasons to be cautious generalizing this result. For one thing, it was not clear exactly how strict the screening process was, so it is hard to say what fraction of ex-offenders are being studied. It could also be that ex-offenders work harder in the Army specifically because they know they face discrimination in the civilian labor market. This would make their promotion records less informative about what would happen if this bias went away.
Still, it is as a whole an encouraging study about the potential of many Americans to make the most of a second chance.
Click here to sign up for the Daily Economy weekly digest!
"Power, by which I mean political power, is always zero-sum: if the intellectual elite has… Read More
"The Biden administration threatens to invoke Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment to sidestep the… Read More
"There are so many holes in the FTC and Sony’s opposition to the Microsoft-Activision merger… Read More
"A wide range of outcomes are still possible for 2023, ranging from stagflation to a… Read More
"The real 'capitalist achievement,' however, isn’t Graceland. It’s the fact that compared to the stuff… Read More
"The unseen cause of gentrification is the knee-jerk NIMBYism of affluent leftist neighborhood associations. And… Read More
"Politicians on the left would like us to believe inflation is caused by greedy corporations.… Read More
"As 'dark horse' candidate, Ramaswamy has a greater burden of proof before the electorate.… Read More
*AIER is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit registered in the US under EIN:04-2121305