Brazil Proves Uber Too Popular for Prohibition

Ride-sharing services have been given a sliver of hope after an updated version of a bill to regulate services like Uber was passed by Brazil’s Senate on Tuesday.

This comes after Uber CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi, warned the Brazilian government that regulations would negatively affect 500,000 drivers and 17 million passengers who use the app.

Currently available in 90 cities, Brazil is Uber’s second-largest market after the United States.

Originally, Brazilian lawmakers wanted to require Uber drivers to apply for licenses with local municipalities to be able to use red number plates typically meant for public-transport vehicles in the country.

“The bill would make the system too bureaucratic,” Fabio Sabba, Uber’s communication chief in Brazil, told the Wall Street Journal. “It would become harder to work.”

Uber drivers are still subject to local authorities’ licensing and tax rules, but officials approved a more lenient version of the bill without the above-mentioned stipulations. It now goes back to Brazil’s lower house for another vote.

This isn’t the only battle Uber executives are fighting in order to get the app into markets around the world.

In September, Transport for London, which runs and regulates the British capital’s transport system, stripped Uber of its license claiming that the company was unfit to run taxi service. Almost a million people have signed a petition on change.org to keep Uber in London, claiming that the ban will put more than 40,000 licensed drivers out of work and deprive millions of Londoners of a convenient and affordable form of transport.

Khosrowshahi and other Uber officials are still in the process of negotiating with London regulators. Uber revenue in Britain rose 59 percent in 2016 to £36.9 million ($49 million).

Uber won big in Texas in 2017 after a bill was signed by Governor Greg Abott (R) that overrode local ordinances that regulate ride-hailing services.

Both Uber and Lyft left Austin after a vote requiring fingerprint-based background checks from ride-sharing drivers and bans on passenger pickup in traffic lanes was passed in May 2016.

Uber and Lyft claimed that background checks were too onerous and should be reserved for security sensitive personnel only.

A proposal from the California Public Utilities Commission aimed to require similar background checks but was ultimately denied by California state legislators.

Uber is currently banned, or heavily regulated in parts of Europe, China, South America, and Canada. 

Image: Viktor_Laszlo.

Published by

The FTC should answer its Call of Duty to Gamers

"There are so many holes in the FTC and Sony’s opposition to the Microsoft-Activision merger… Read More

May 22, 2023

What’s Next for the Fed?

"A wide range of outcomes are still possible for 2023, ranging from stagflation to a… Read More

May 22, 2023

Economic Growth Makes Graceland Less Impressive

"The real 'capitalist achievement,' however, isn’t Graceland. It’s the fact that compared to the stuff… Read More

May 21, 2023

All Housing is Still Affordable Housing: “Seen and Unseen” Edition

"The unseen cause of gentrification is the knee-jerk NIMBYism of affluent leftist neighborhood associations. And… Read More

May 21, 2023

The Greedflation Myth

"Politicians on the left would like us to believe inflation is caused by greedy corporations.… Read More

May 20, 2023

Three Proposals for Price Stability

"As 'dark horse' candidate, Ramaswamy has a greater burden of proof before the electorate.… Read More

May 20, 2023

America’s Long Depression

"The US economy may continue to grow or shrink few percent from year to… Read More

May 19, 2023

Without Economic Freedom, None of the Others Matter

"Forbidding entrepreneurial ventures that have not been granted prior approval and design review by unelected… Read More

May 19, 2023

*AIER is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit registered in the US under EIN:04-2121305