fbpx
November 10, 2021 Reading Time: 2 minutes

Many readers will be aware that President Biden has proposed new taxes on the rich to help fund his expenditure plans. As this article explains, a big part of his tax proposal is to tax the unrealized capital gains of people who have assets exceeding $1 billion, which is about 700 people.

Despite objections from both Democrats and Republicans, two things that can help promote the proposal are that (1) it would only tax a very few people, and (2) the rich are not all that popular, as a group, among most Americans. Working against the proposal is that “money talks” and the people who would be subject to those new taxes have money.

Given the nature of the proposal, most Americans would think that the proposal would not apply to them, but ultimately they would be mistaken. President Biden’s proposal would be a foot in the door to extend that same tax to everyone.

When the federal income tax was created in 1913, the highest marginal income tax bracket was 7% and the standard deduction was high enough that most Americans did not owe any tax. People who had factory jobs or office jobs would not meet the income threshold. It was a plan to tax the rich.

By 1921, less than a decade after the tax was implemented, the highest marginal income tax bracket had risen to 73%, and while rates did fall between the World Wars, the highest marginal tax rate eventually went up to 92% in 1952. Meanwhile, with the onset of World War II, the standard deduction was dropped, making most income earners liable for the tax, and withholding was implemented to facilitate the government’s tax collections.

Once a tax is implemented for some, it becomes easier to extend it to everyone. Nobody should think that a tax, once placed on the rich, will not eventually apply to them. And, it can happen very fast, as the income tax experience during World War I showed.

It appears unlikely that this tax will be implemented, but just having been suggested increases the danger that it will be implemented in the future. With huge budget deficits, all it would take would be some future crisis for this tax to look like a good option to policy makers. And once the rich are subject to the tax, you will be next.

Reprinted from the Independent Institute

Randall G. Holcombe

Randall G. Holcombe

Randall G. Holcombe is DeVoe Moore Professor of Economics at Florida State University. He received his Ph.D. in economics from Virginia Tech, and taught at Texas A&M University and at Auburn University prior to coming to Florida State in 1988. Dr. Holcombe is also Senior Fellow at the James Madison Institute and is Senior Fellow at the Independent Institute in Oakland, California.

Dr. Holcombe is the author of twenty books and more than 200 articles published in academic and professional journals. His books include Political Capitalism: How Economic and Political Power Is Made and Maintained (2018) and Coordination, Cooperation, and Control: The Evolution of Economic and Political Power (2020).

Get notified of new articles from Randall G. Holcombe and AIER.
AIER - American Institute for Economic Research

250 Division Street | PO Box 1000
Great Barrington, MA 01230-1000

Contact AIER
Telephone: 1-888-528-1216 | Fax: 1-413-528-0103

Press and other media outlets contact
888-528-1216
[email protected]

Editorial Policy

This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
except where copyright is otherwise reserved.

© 2021 American Institute for Economic Research
Privacy Policy

AIER is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
registered in the US under EIN: 04-2121305