It’s Official: We’re in a Recession PDF Print E-mail
Written by Polina Vlasenko   
Tuesday, 02 December 2008 00:00

The National Bureau of Economic Research, the nonpartisan group charged with making the call, announced Monday that U.S. economy entered a recession in December 2007. AIER’s statistical indicators, in contrast, warned about a recession months before its official start date and more than a year and a half before NBER’s official announcement.

We first wrote that the recession was likely, based on the analysis of our statistical indicators of business-cycle conditions, in April 2007. By July 2008, we wrote that the recession had probably begun. Last December, the official peak of economic activity that marked the start of the recession, AIER had already begun to warn that the recession was likely, despite the seemingly upbeat economic data available at the time.

AIER’s methodology aims at forecasting the reversals in business-cycle trends just before or shortly after they happen, when there is still time to alter plans in preparation for an economic downturn. Given the complexity of measuring economic activity accurately, it is rare to forecast the business-cycle reversals exactly. A discrepancy of a few months is inevitable, but AIER forecasts usually lead the official start date of a recession by several months. 

The current recession, which is the 11th since World War II, ended an expansion that lasted 73 months. The table below shows when AIER first said a turn in the business cycle was likely compared to the official dates for business-cycle peaks and troughs. 

AIER “Forecasts” of Business-Cycle Turns     

-----------------

Peaks

--------------- -----------------

Troughs

------
NBER Date AIER Forecast   NBER Date AIER Forecast  
Jul. 1953 Jun. 1953 (–1)* May 1954 Jun. 1954 (+1)*
Aug. 1957 Jan. 1957 (–7) Apr. 1958 Jun. 1958 (+2)
Apr. 1960 Feb. 1960 (–2) Feb. 1961 May 1961 (+3)
Dec. 1969 Aug. 1969 (–4) Nov. 1970 Mar. 1972 (+16)
Nov. 1973 Nov. 1973 (0) Mar. 1975 Jun. 1975 (+3)
Jan. 1980 Jul. 1979 (–6) Jul. 1980 Sept. 1980 (+2)
Jul. 1981 Oct. 1981 (+3) Nov. 1982 Apr. 1982 (–7)
Jul. 1990 Jan. 1990 (–6) Mar. 1991 Jun. 1991 (+3)
Mar. 2001 May 2001 (+2) Nov. 2001 Mar. 2002 (+4)
Dec. 2007 Apr. 2007 (–8)      
* Lead (–) or lag (+) in months from business-cycle peak or trough.

To receive AIER’s detailed monthly analysis of business-cycle conditions, plus articles and books on a wide range of economic issues, become a member.

Bookmark this article:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
 
Comments (5)
America's Economic Downturn
5 Monday, 20 April 2009 04:40
Johnathan
The economic decline caused by a recession penetrates every part of daily life. A small number of professionals are immune to strenuous lending standards, decreased property values and other characteristics that can ruin finances for a majority of people. Low-income families and individuals with high debt loads need to think about ways to survive a recession. The U.S. economy is shaky for pretty much everybody. Not only is it bad for Americans, but also lousy U.S. economy hits the whole world hard. The U.S. bailout measures are good for everyone worldwide, if the cash advances being made work like they're intended to. However, some are insisting that the bailout is going to wreck the budget and make the deficit explode. Obama and others insist there will be cuts made that will make up for it. Regardless, let us hope that the short-term loans we're making will help to bring back the "U.S. economy".
Windfallprofit tax to the only business that made money for the last 2 years.
4 Sunday, 07 December 2008 20:05
Dorothy Moss
That was going 4 miles down the road and made 16 trips per truck per day. So can you imagine how much it cost to get groceries to the store. I think they the oil companies should be slapped with a windfall profit tax, cause whoever heard of an oil company making 15 billion dollar profit for the quarter, every quarter. That was made off of everybody that owns a car or truck or big truck. If you wanted to work, you had to buy gas. Bush is going out of office and gas has dropped over 3.50 since July. Bush owns his own oil company and his own oil wells. That should be self explanatory where all that money went and who had their hand out to get their share of the profits. He had the power to make them drop the cost of gas, but that would have been taking money out of Bush's pocket. Diesel fuel should be 50 cents a gallon. It went to 4.99 gallon here in WV. Some places here it went to 5.15 gallon. It is the first thing to come off of crude to make gas. When gas was going up, and it was below 40 dollars a barrel what it is now, it was 1.29 gallon, here it is 1.69 to 1.89. They are saying the oil companies made their money on the way up and the service station owners are making theirs on the way down. I knew this was coming in 2007, I made 445,000.00 last year. And made that in 11 months. Sounds like I should be rich or at least have money in the bank, when my contract ended last October, I owed nobody nothing, paid for everything with cash, check, or debit card, didnt owe anybody anything and didnt have any money either. Hope next year is better than this one. Cant get any worse. But when Obama gets in, things will change, will just take time.
We're in a recession
3 Thursday, 04 December 2008 19:13
T. Hunt
The definition of a recession, per my understanding of AIER publications, is two quarters of declining GDP as computed by the NBER. The NBER does not predict; it announces. The NBER is always after the fact because much of the data is not finalized until several months later. Hence, all forcasters, including AIER, can only continue to predict until NBER numbers are finalized.
Re: We're in a recession
2 Wednesday, 03 December 2008 12:16
Polina Vlasenko
Mr. Gilchrist,

Our methodology aims at warning about a recession somewhat ahead of time, while the information can still be usefully employed in adjusting one's plans for a coming downturn. Therefore, I would consider warning about a recession 8 months in advance of its "official start date" to be quite good an outcome.
You bring up a valid point that there is a difference between warning that a recession is imminent and asserting that the recession has already started. We did say, in the Research Reports issue from July 7, 2008, that our analysis suggests business contraction has begun (at that point the analysis was based on the available data, which only provided information though May of 2008). Thus, we did “call the recession” in early July, while NBER made their determination only this week.
No forecasting procedure is perfect, and ours is not an exception. It would be great to find a procedure that allowed us to predict the business cycle turns more precisely than we currently can, but we have not found one yet. Our current methodology is better at warning about an imminent recession that at timing the date of the downturn exactly. Our hope is that this information is still useful to our reader.

Respectfully,
Polina Vlasenko
We're in a recession
1 Tuesday, 02 December 2008 11:27
Dean Gilchrist
Granted that the AIER indicators suggested a recession was coming 8 months in advance of December 2007, but why did you continue to "predict" it for 11 months after it is now said to have begun?

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: