The Commodity Debate PDF Print E-mail
Written by Kenneth D'Amica   
Monday, 16 June 2008 04:10
The recent spike in commodity prices has sparked a worldwide debate over its causes. In particular, food and oil have reached the tops of many agendas as protests over prices erupt in many parts of the world.

There are many who point to the diversion of crops to biofuel production as a major source of rising food prices, though estimates of the actual impact of biofuels on food markets vary broadly. For example, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that biofuels are to blame for 30 percent of food price increases, while U.S. estimates put this figure at three percent.

Others say that an amalgam of disparate ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­causes have brought about high food prices. This includes speculation, rising demand in developing nations, protectionism, drought in major food-producing nations such as Australia and Canada, and rising fuel and fertilizer costs.

The debate on oil centers on whether or not recent prices reflect a ‘bubble’ caused by speculation and market manipulation. If not, then these prices may indicate a more fundamental and permanent shift brought about by rising demand in developing nations and supply-sided strains.

However, there is some evidence to suggest that the effect of speculation on prices may be limited. For instance, while the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude has more than doubled since January 2006, other traded commodities have been stable. The price of cotton futures has increased 19 percent since the start of 2006 while cattle prices are unchanged. Meanwhile, the price of Central Appalachian (CAPP) coal, which is not traded in the futures market, increased over 150 percent since January 2007.

Even if speculation is not the culprit, however, it remains unclear whether or not one should expect prices to decrease. Wheat prices, for instance, have retreated from their March 2008 peaks due to robust production growth that is expected to continue, though they remain well above historic levels. Other commodities may experience similar supply growth in response to prices, though oil producers are likely to be among the least able to respond in the short term.

Share this article:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
 
Comments (3)
Speculation
3 Sunday, 22 June 2008 13:54
Kirk Harwood
The 18 June 2008 Commentary does a nice job of focusing the pricing pressure on oil. I saw some newsletter commentary forwarded by a friend on speculation being the bane of our situation. In the text the author commented that these recent speculators "never sell." In addition to the logical fallacy (the purpose of speculation is to sell at a profit), I thought the tone was interesting.

Futures speculation, and speculation in general, gets a bad rap. I'd like to see some authoritative commentary (e.g. AIER) on the value of speculators and their speculations.
Oil price
2 Tuesday, 17 June 2008 08:00
Shafayat Chowdhury
A big component of the crude price hike is supply falling short of demand. For instance, several OPEC producers such as Venezuela and Nigeria cut production over the last year, and this effect is undoubtedly being reflected in the prices now.

As for inflation world-wide - let's not forget the increases in government spending across the globe - it surely bolsters inflation instead of hurting it.
Commodity price levels
1 Monday, 16 June 2008 22:50
John Olander
Would like to see corn and maybe soybean prices added to the chart.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: