The Federal Budget in Perspective PDF Print E-mail
Written by Kerry A. Lynch   
Wednesday, 16 September 2009 00:00

Over the next 10 years, federal spending is projected to remain at historically high levels, revenues are projected to rise from their current post-World War II lows to near postwar highs, and ongoing federal deficits are projected to add $10 trillion to the federal debt. This according to the latest analysis from White House’s Office of Management and Budget.


Source for Projections: Mid-Session Review, FY 2010, Office of Management and Budget. (Click to enlarge chart.)

Federal tax receipts will be roughly 15 percent of GDP this year – the lowest level since 1950. This recession has hit them harder than most downturns. However, the Obama administration projects that receipts will rebound sharply and eventually reach 19 percent of GDP. Revenues have rarely been that high for a sustained period in the post-World War II era. The major sources of the extra revenue are projected to be rebounding income taxes and “climate revenues” (from policies designed to curb carbon emissions).

On the spending side, outlays are now at 25 percent of GDP, the highest since World War II. This percentage is projected to fall as the economy rebounds and the financial crisis passes, leveling off at 23 percent of GDP, which again would be unusually high in historical terms.

One source of higher outlays will be rising interest payments on the ballooning federal debt. By 2019, the government is projected to spend more on interest payments than on national defense. Defense spending is projected to drop back, as a share of GDP, to a post-World War II low, roughly to the level reached during the “peace dividend” years of the late 1990s (the brief interlude between the end of the Cold War and the attacks of 9/11).

The federal deficit – the gap between spending and outlays – is projected to decline from 11 percent of GDP this year to about 4 percent of GDP from 2015 onward. Aside from Worl War II, the U.S. has never run such large deficits for so long, with no expected improvement in sight. In the past, large deficits were usually driven by increased in military spending – sometimes a huge increase, as in World Wars I and II, sometimes a smaller one, as in Vietnam and the 1980s. This time, that’s not the case.

Moreover, these projections stop in 2019, before the full wave of baby-boom retirements hits Social Security and Medicare. So the longer-term budget outlook is actually even worse. Barring some unexpected improvement or a stretch of exceptionally rapid economic growth, it would appear that some combination of higher taxes, reduced spending, or increased inflating (printing more money) is inevitable.

Bookmark this article:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
 
Comments (6)
Federal Budget Projections
6 Monday, 21 September 2009 08:54
Kerry Lynch
AIER has published many articles critical of chronic deficit spending, including some, such as "Red Ink Nation" written during the Bush years. These articles are available on AIER's web site in the online archives.
Federal Budget Projections
5 Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:33
Dr. Frank Stallone
Where was AIER when W was spending like a drunken sailor?
An option
4 Thursday, 17 September 2009 05:57
John A. McMinn
The Fed now tells us that the recession is over. So, it seems logical that we can cancel the need for the remaining unspent stimulus money and reduce the Federal deficit by the same amount. By reducing this debt burden hanging over us we can plan better for expansion and thus create more jobs which was the objective in the first place. Just a thought. Anyone like to take it forward?
"Projections"
3 Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:16
VincentMVNY
I have a idea to save millions if not billions of dollars. Stop making projections 1 year, 5 year, 10 years out! It is impossible for any projection more than a week ahead. There are a trillion different things going on every day and a good portion of those trillion independent transactions do not and cannot take into account the actions of other nations, cataclysmic weather or terrorist events that could happen, and on and on. Just stupid and a waste of time. "Federal receipts will go from 15% to 19% of GDP"! Where did they pull this nugget from?
Who the hell knows what could possibly happen in the future? You could make just as credible a prediction that it can go from go from 15% to 1% of GDP if the madness continues.
Federal Budget in Perspective
2 Wednesday, 16 September 2009 16:09
Jacob D Steelman
Until the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 expenditures and tax receipts as a percentage of USA GDP were in balance. With the creation of the Fed and with it the fractional reserve banking system and fiat currency created out of thin air government expenditures no longer had to be in balance with receipts. If tax receipts would not cover expenditures simply create more money to pay for the deficit. Expand the money supply (inflation). Tax the citizenry by depreciating the value of their money relative to the price of goods and service (price increases). There was no longer any restriction on government expenditures and expansion of government programs or entering into expensive wars such as WWI, Hoover-FDR's Great Depression programs and WWII, Korean War, Vietnam War, LBJ's War on Poverty,the Great Society, Grenada intervention, Iraq I and II wars, Afghan war. Unless the Fed is abolished the expansion of government and destruction of wealth will only continue around the world.
"TEA BAG SIGN"
1 Wednesday, 16 September 2009 11:31
RJALLO
LIKE THE SIGN AT THE "TEA BAG DEMOSTRATIONS" STATED "THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE TO RAISE TAXES....JUST PRINT MORE MONEY."

ENOUGH SAID!!!!

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: