Taxes and Price Inflation Can Eat Your Investment Income PDF Print E-mail
Written by Keming Liang   
Wednesday, 26 August 2009 00:00

Price inflation plays a major role when it comes to the value of money, particularly in the long term. In fact, according to AIER’s most recent CPI (Consumer Price Index) update, it now takes about $1.30 to buy what $1 bought 10 years ago.

When it comes to investments, however, taxes also play a powerful role in eroding returns.

The first chart shows the impact of price inflation and taxes on the yields of 10-year Treasury securities since the 1950s. Ten-year Treasuries’ nominal (or apparent) yields escalated through the 1970s and peaked in 1981. They have decreased since then to 4 or 5 percent for most of this decade. 

Nominal, Read and After-tax 10-year Treasury Yields
Source: Federal Reserve Board.
Click to Enlarge Chart.

When nominal yields are adjusted for price inflation, the resulting real yields show a different pattern. Major discrepancies between nominal and real yields appeared in the 1970s, when price inflation was in double-digit territory. Nominal yields kept pace, but real yields (nominals - the rate of inflation) were at times actually negative.

This painful pattern—negative real yields—recurred in the beginning of 2008 and lasted 10 months, as a byproduct of the Fed's push to lift the economy out of recession by keeping interest rates close to zero.

When income taxes enter the picture, the returns are even lower. Assuming the highest marginal tax rates for investment income, in the 1950s about 90 percent of the returns was taken in taxes. In the 1960s and 1970s, the top rate was about 70 percent. Although the current highest rate is more favorable, investors still have to pay taxes of 35 percent on the income from their investment.

The combined effect of price inflation and taxes under these assumptions is shown by the green line in the chart above. In "normal" times, the after-tax real return on 10-year Treasuries is negligible (one or two percent) or actually negative. This has been a consistent pattern beginning in the early 1980s. 

These are not normal times. As the the second chart shows, real and after-tax real yields on 10-year Treasuries have suddenly risen to about 5 and 4 percent, respectively. As sky-high energy prices have come down over the past year, the measured CPI has fallen by about 2 percent. The effect, paradoxically, is to raise the real return on these notes—even after taxes. 

Nominal, Real and After-tax 10 Year Treasury Yields 2006-09
Source: Federal Reserve Board.
Click to Enlarge Chart.

The temporary price deflation of the past year or so has boosted real yields to the highest level on record. Even after income taxes, to repeat, real yields on 10-year Treasuries are as high as nominal pre-tax yields. 

However dramatic, this outcome is likely to be only temporary, an artifact of the effect falling oil prices have had on measured price inflation. When things get back to normal, the CPI will resume its upward climb.

One way to protect Treasury bonds from price inflation and taxes is to invest in Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) and keep them in an IRA or other tax-deferred account until you are in a lower tax bracket. (The latter strategy might backfire, however, if you find yourself in a higher tax bracket down the road.) AIER has a more detailed analysis of TIPS in the July 20th issue of Research Reports. Available free to AIER subscribers or $2 for non-members.

Share this article:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
 

Other articles by Keming Liang:

Comments (5)
TIPS and conventional Treasurys
5 Wednesday, 26 August 2009 22:04
Phil in Florida
To R. Fuld:

You ask, “If TIPS are a better option then why buy 10-year Treasurys at all?” The answer is that conventional Treasurys are a better option when price inflation is less than expected. Conventional Treasurys compensate their buyers for expected inflation at the time of purchase; TIPS compensate their buyers for whatever inflation rate (low or high) that occurs. Buy TIPS to avoid the risk due to inflation; buy conventional Treasurys if you want to bet that inflation will be less than what the market expects. It’s a good idea, like Keming says, to defer taxes.
Our savvy treasury
4 Wednesday, 26 August 2009 14:58
Bill in Boston
The way I read this chart, the treasury made money with their 10 year bonds, most years. They paid back in inflated dollars, then taxed the purchasers on their nominal interest. They're smarter than I thought, insofar as they found high income individuals to buy.
to R.Fuld
3 Wednesday, 26 August 2009 10:44
Keming Liang
I recommend you read AIER's July 20th issue of Research Reports. It answers your questions of whether or not 10-year treasuries have MUCH HIGHER yields and how conventional 10-year treasuries do not fully take inflation into account.
WRONG
2 Wednesday, 26 August 2009 09:48
R.FULD
THE ADVICE AT THE END OF THIS ARTICLE IS MISLEADING AND SHOWS POOR UNDERSTNADING OF INVESTMENTS. IF TIPS ARE A BETTER OPTION THEN WHY BUY 10-YR TREASURYS AT ALL? IF YOU HAD BOTHERED TO ASK YOURSELF THESE QUESTIONS, THEN MAYBE YOU WOULD HAVE DONE SOME RESEARCH AND DISCOVERED THAT 10-YR NOTES SELL AT GREATER DISCOUNTS THAN TIPS (WHICH OFTEN SELL FOR A PREMIUM). YIELDS OF 10 YR TREASURYS ARE USUALLY MUCH HIGHER. BOTH THESE INVESTMENTS HAVE ZERO CREDIT RISK (YES I HAVE FAITH IN THE US GOVT). THE ONLY UNCERTAINTY COMES FROM THE RISK OF INFLATION AND 10-YR TREASURYS ALREADY TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT WHEN PRICED.

THE LACK OF UNDERSTANDING IN THIS ARTICLE IS CONCERNING TO ME. CORRECT ME IF I’M WRONG. OTHERWISE GO DO YOUR HOMEWORK BEFORE HANDING OUT INVESTMENT ADVICE.
MUTUAL FUNDS
1 Wednesday, 26 August 2009 09:31
RJALLO
IF YOU INVEST IN MUTUAL FUNDS YOU MAY HAVE LOST MORE THAN 50% OF YOUR INVESTMENT...YET YOU COULD NOT CLAIM THE LOST UNLESS YOU SOLD THE FUND.

IN GOOD TIMES MUTUAL FUNDS PROVIDE 1099 FORMS TO THEIR CUSTOMERS SO THEY CAN ADD THE PROFIT THEY EARNED ON SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS TO THEIR TAX FILING...EVEN THOUGH NO MONEY HAS CHANGED HANDS...THERE IS ONLY A PAPER PROFIT...YET THE TAX PAYER DEPENDING ON TAX BRACKETT COULD BE PAYING UP TO 50% TAX ON MONEY NEVER RECEIVED.

IT SEEMS THAT THE IRS DOES NOT USE THE SAME RULES ON LOSSES!

HMMMMMMMMMMMM! VERY INTERESTING?

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: