Tax Revenue Plummets PDF Print E-mail
Written by Kerry Lynch   
Wednesday, 20 May 2009 00:00

Income tax season is over and the numbers are in, and from the standpoint of the U.S. Treasury, they’re not good. 

Federal tax revenues are collected throughout the year but are highest in the month of April, when most tax returns are filed. A year ago, the Treasury’s April revenue totaled $404 billion. This April, it fell to just $266 billion. That’s the largest April-to-April decrease since at least 1981 (the earliest year for which we could find monthly data).

Percent Change in Monthly Federal Receipts for Fiscal Years 1981-2009

A breakdown shows the following decreases:

Federal Receipts (billions of dollars)
  April 2009 April 2008 Percent Change
Individual Income Taxes $137 $244 -44%
Social Security and Other Payroll Taxes 91 92 -1%
Corporate Income Taxes 15 42 -64%
Other 23 26 -12%
Total $266 $404 -34%

What does this imply for the Federal budget? The revenue side has not been the major factor in the ballooning Federal deficit, which is projected to be $1.8 trillion this year, 10 times larger than it was two years ago. The main culprit has been the extraordinary increase in government spending. But the revenue side does matter. Had it not been for the cyclical downturn in revenue, the deficit would be significantly smaller than it now is.

The Obama administration projects that revenues will rebound in 2011, partly as a result of the stimulus package. Indeed, they project that revenues will eventually be larger, relative to GDP, than they were even during the boom years of the late 1990s (when we had budget surpluses). Even if that does happen, the administration also projects that government spending will be so much higher each year that large deficits will continue, and the national debt held by the public will double over the next 10 years. If revenues don’t rebound as much as projected, the debt will be that much higher.
 

Bookmark this article:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
 
Comments (6)
Why oil companies should be taxed at higher rate
6 Tuesday, 04 August 2009 11:28
ralph Petrillo
THere are always conservatives that love to protect oil company wealth and salaries. Many countries nationalize their oil industries. The last CEO that left Exxon left with a one billion dollar buyout. Now is the time for change. He should have been given 50 million at most and the other 950 million could have gone to the Treasury Department . Oil is in constant demand, and the government should place a 100% tax on oil when it is above $ 40 a barrel, and overnight we will have a surplus. Women used to love cowboys not oil executives that rip off the public!
How to fix the deficit
5 Wednesday, 22 July 2009 10:49
LisaM
Hmmm, let's raise taxes on the really rich oil companies. Hell, let's raise taxes on everyone that actually produces wealth in this country and give more money to those that just suck up the wealth. Half the people in this country are in a negative tax bracket. That's right, they actually get net money back from the government through schemes like the EIC and Child Tax Credit. How about this for a "change": GOVERNMENT SPENDS LESS. Return it to Constitutional authority. This means getting the gov't out of all health care, education, etc. bringing home our troops and placing them along the Southern US border. Now that's change I can believe in.
How to increase federal tax revenue and restructure business strategy
4 Saturday, 11 July 2009 10:39
Ralph Petrillo
Clearly there are to many U.S corporations that were encouraged to increase their level of debt so that their growth would continue. The government is now receiving less tax revenue from these corporations during the recession for with growth and revenue declining, profit has decreases. There is a very simple solution. Tax gross income at 7%, and get rid of taxing net income. Tax collection would double over night. So a company like Exxon Mobil that has gross revenue of $440 billion would owe approximately $30 billion a year. Currently they claim net income is only approximately 40 billion, and they pay approximately 13 billion in taxes. With a 7% tax on gross income the federal government doubles its revenue by following gross income. Overnight revenues for the federal government will increase.
Tax revenues
3 Sunday, 31 May 2009 19:25
sllewis
As a private investor in California I am interested in timely figures of Federal and State tax revenues as real-time indicators. This is my first visit to your website which is quite helpful. I have not purchased any California munis this year, not even the recent BABs and have switched cash to a national muni mny market.The outlook here is pretty grim. I would like current tax revenues for California and Texas if you could give me some guidance. Thanks.
Other tax revenues?
2 Friday, 22 May 2009 09:05
WinstonO
Kerry, I'm very interested in any data you have on local property tax receipts and delinquencies. My suspicion is that receipts have grown faster than the economy until recently and have led to both higher spending and justfied construction bonds that will now risk default. I recognize property valuations lag reality in most places but I'm guessing delinquencies and uncollectable receipts are way up. Can you point me to any data sources?
TAX REVENUE DECLINE
1 Wednesday, 20 May 2009 08:43
RJALLO
Governement spending increases annually whether or not tax revenues increase. Our politicians do not understand simple third grade math let alone basic accounting principles.

Aside from spending money like drunken sailors...our government must understand there are limits. Yesterday Sec. of State Clinton gaveaway $100 millions dollars to Pakistan. In my opinio I am sure there are many areas were this money could have done a whole lot of good for the citizens of this country...and we continue to give money away...in many cases to our enemies.

How do that saying go again " God help those who..."

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: